Find a Lawyer

ZAFAR IQBAL versus STATE

Sections 7 (e) and 30 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), definition of section 365 A / 34 evidence, reduction of one of the accused, did not appeal his conviction, but only his And prayed for a change. He was sentenced to life imprisonment by another accused, who was arrested by the police while he was going to the market to buy vegetables, but no proposal was given to the inquiry officer in this regard and he supported I did not inspect any witnesses. The personal verbal charge of the allegations related to this statement could not be given any weight as the third accused, dismissed by the prosecution's overwhelming evidence, arrested him and his younger brother from his shop and arrested them. They demanded Rs 50,000 for release. Do not disturb any confidence and it appears that they are ready to escape punishment. The fourth suspect pleaded with Alibi, except for his oral statement that he was working at the time of the incident at a cotton factory contractor. However, he did not present any evidence in support of Ali's plea that he had nothing to show that he had no need to falsely implicate the accused in such a heinous crime. ? There was ample evidence to confirm the arrest of the accused while receiving the ransom, the recovery of the kidnappers and the simultaneous arrest of his co-accused, all the abductors were found in a room with their legs tied. They were tied to their backs and the investigating officer had no intention of falsely convicting the kidnappers, they were consistent in all material details. registration advocate from Sajawal lawyer