Find a Lawyer

GHULAM NABI versus STATE

Sections 302 (b), 364a, 382, 404, 441, 109 and 34 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), reversal of evidence presented for the last time witness witness The last recorded judicial confession recorded on the last day of physical remand was free of guilt and recovery, and the recovery was that after abducting a minor girl, he committed the murder (the complainant) suspicion and the last Evidence Trial Court / Special Court sentenced the accused and sentenced him to death under section 2bb (b), PPC and two counts under 36 AA, PPC's appeal was subsequently filed. Was MIT court the accused claimed that no evidence last time. There is no identifiable value; it may not be sufficient to prove the accused's recovery of a dead body and the murder of the victim's golden ear ring. Police manipulated the accused's judicial confession through violence, so it didn't matter. That on the last day of his physical remand with the police, the accused's judicial confession was recorded and such facts and cases could not possibly justify the death sentence, but the sentence of life imprisonment could be fulfilled. It was sufficient for the witnesses to the evidence at the last minute, and the recoveries were sufficiently free and the trust was impressive that the defendants could not identify any material contradiction or contradiction in the prosecution's evidence, as indicated The credibility of the evidence for the recovery of bodies and other articles related to the deceased can be observed. Last seen evidence of any enmity, personal grudge or coercion against the accused for making false statements in evidence top advocate from Jandanwala lawyer