Find a Lawyer

DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER versus HAFIZ MUHAMMAD ISHAQ AHMAD NOORI

Article 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) Failure to freely consider the issue of return of appointment letters, compliance with the order passed by the government employees of the Supreme Court was appointed by the school teachers but the general order Upon release, their appointments were canceled. Based on the irregularities at the time of his appointment, the Supreme Court directed the authorities to consider each matter independently and then decide the cases of public servants. Authorities approved the order of the post-remand proceedings. , And retained the appeals filed by public servants, the Service Tribunal once again accepted, and the plea taken by the authorities sent to the authorities to re-decide the cases was that they considered the issues independently. Was gone and service tribunal is not authorized to remand cases for regular inquiry Even in the post-remand orders, except in name and change of names, etc., the orders had the same meaning in all cases whereby the competent authority failed to exercise its mind freely on the facts of each case, The service was correct in instructing the tribunal official to regularly consider matters of public servants. The inquiry order which the tribunal passed was fair and reasonable and, as per the first order of the Supreme Court, no interference was sought by the Supreme Court. best advocate from Wahi hassain lawyer