Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM KHAN versus STATE

By denying a witness to the prosecution in its statement under Section 497 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 364, 342, 201 and 202/34, Section 164, the CR PC made the accused fully involved. And despite a lengthy cross-examination by the lawyer, the defendant could not remove his statement from the recorded material that revealed that the victim had been shot and killed in the encounter, resulting in his inquiry. The committee was formed to ascertain whether the deceased was in fact a target or a step-by-step encounter, and whether the victim was killed by the police. He was arrested a few days ago, and such investigation was carried out by five high ranking officers, and it was concluded that the victim was arrested a few days before the alleged encounter and beaten in an encounter by police. had gone. The case was not the same as the defendant's lawyer requested, but on the contrary, it was a case of tampering with the prosecution's evidence, which was available to Bell. The accused committed the murder of the deceased in a false contest No hostility or malice was brought against the police and there was sufficient material available to link the accused to the commission of fines under section 230 under, PPC bail. The suspect was denied, circumstances immigration advocates email from Dera Ismail Khan lawyer