Find a Lawyer

REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE versus SYED JAVED AKBAR

The resumption of the Section 5 service resignation, the return of the Impact Judicial Officer, submitted his resignation on 2 3 1998 and it was withdrawn on 20 4 1998, while it was accepted on 2 5 1998, while the authorities held that the Judicial Officer. Was absent from duty for 71 days. The Punjab Subordinate Judicial Service Tribunal allowed the appeal of the Judicial Officer on the ground that it would not be proper for him to perform judicial duties after his resignation. Thus, the Judicial Officer was not absent. Restored the benefit. Since he was practicing at the bar and was interfering with the date of his relinquishment and resume, such leave was considered as acceptance by the authority authorized to resign or withdraw. Can be called. Supreme Court refuses to interfere in decision, dismissed appeal granted by service tribunal attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Jampur lawyer