Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASIF ALIAS AASU versus STATE

Definition of Section 2 (b (b)) evidence provided the complainant with irrevocable corrections to his judicial statement The version given by the complainant in the FIR was in sharp contrast to the version presented in this court and contradictions in both versions. , The contradictions and improvements by which the nature of the firearm was used. The suspect was not disclosed by the complainant, nor in the FIR or before the court draftsman in his plan, almost all points in the site plan The key points were not disclosed, the investigating officer admitted that the khunchi was a crime weapon. No blood stains were on the eyes. According to witnesses, various parts of his body were also shot several times with an iron scrap and a shot of twelve bourbons, yet according to the doctor, his clothes were not blood stains or any fragments. Holes were numerous fractures of the skull bone and multiple penetrating wounds in the dead body, but still the last worn clothes were not stained with blood. The prosecution version, thus, was highly unlikely. famous high court advocate from Sohawa District Jelum lawyer