Find a Lawyer

SHARAFAT ALI versus STATE

Section 302 (b) / 34 Criminal Code (v. 1898), Section 173 Definition of Evidence The filing of a private complaint FIR and the delay in conducting a post-mortem are not related to the intended evidence and are treated with subpoena and collar accounts. Evidence is not supported. The co-accused, along with the appellant accused, allegedly committed the murder of the victim with a firearm shot, after it was alleged that the accused wanted to release the land that the complaining party had taken at least. The trial court acquitted the accused, the culprit and the convicted accused / appellants of death because of this alleged accused committee murder, accused of dissatisfaction with conducting the investigation of the accused complainant. Both witnesses are interesting witnesses. During the investigation, statements of witnesses were dropped and a new set of suspects was introduced, against which a report under section 737373, CCPC, was brought before the court so that the case could be dealt with. That private complaint was filed with the noble name. That the statements of both witnesses were contradictory. That the medical evidence does not support the ocular account; that the crime was not cleared on that occasion and that the delay of five hours in filing the FIR and post-mortem on the following evening was not sufficient, the prosecution's story Can be of no importance The names of the witnesses and the names of the accused were given as the delay in post mortem examination on the body of the deceased was sufficient to indicate that the police papers were not ready and hence the post mortem was delayed. best law firm from Guddu lawyer