Find a Lawyer

M.AS. (AG) NOS.600/LB TO 602/LB OF 2006 AND I.T.AS. NOS.7393/LB TO 7395/LB OF 2005, DECIDED ON 6TH O versus M.AS. (AG) NOS.600/LB TO 602/LB OF 2006 AND I.T.AS. NOS.7393/LB TO 7395/LB OF 2005, DECIDED ON 6TH O

Section 24 (FFF) Salaried Assessor claims that nowhere is it stated as Section 24 (FFF) of Income Tax Ordinance 1979 that if any excess salary is paid through a cross check This will not be allowed, but according to the law, if the payment of more than 5,000 salaries has been made through a cross check, it will not be allowed to be deducted from the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 (24). Was terminated under Section 24 of Section 24 (FF). The Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, which deals with payments due to expenses under a single head, which in total is more than Rs 50,000, may have been the intention of the Legislature to document the economy through a cross check. Is not properly drafted, but the intention was clear that the Assisi did not pay the salary through cross-check, the provisions of the Income Tax Section 24 (FFF) or the Danes, applicable 1979 applicable and Was applied and the expenses were denied as unacceptable conviction that the salary should be deducted from the appropriate tax on the salary and collected according to the law. Or it should have been, other than that it should not be elled because salaries were not paid through banking channels. The appellate tribunal dismissed the appeal on this basis. \ r \ n \ r \ n immigration advocate from Shahdad Kot lawyer