Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX, COMPANIES ZONE-III, LAHORE versus MIAN IJAZ AHMAD


Issue of notice under section 65 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 relating to the controversial question relating to the restoration of Sections 65 and 136 High Court, notice was issued under Section 65 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, Issued by the Commissioner Income Tax (Appeal) was charged against the Assisi Appeal filed by the Appellate Authority which was not given notice on the Issuance Order approved by the Appellate Authority, the authorities filed through the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Play. Raised that the notice was taken under section 65. The service of such notice was legitimately reviewed by the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, otherwise it was a question of fact and it was not decided by the High Court using the jurisdiction under Section 136 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979. can go. There was a situation in which the High Court of Appeal required expression

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Kech lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.