Find a Lawyer

HAZIR versus MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE

R2 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Applicant The tenant was the tenant of the respondents, the court ruled on payment of 2 / 5th of the suit filed by the defendants and the applicant. Appeal from the ground before the Commissioner was dismissed. And before the Board of Revenue, the petition filed by the applicant submitted that the proprietor was the co-owner of the property column, the suit land, showing that the applicant was a co-owner But the specific measles number was in the possession of the defendants and the applicant was subject to payment of the tax under them. Such a concept was quite different from that of a tenant, which was not related to the applicant's purchase of the shares in the possession of the joint, but to take part in the joint lease, but their possession was under the respondents. Such registration was not questioned by the petitioner in the income record in the acquisition of the specific measles number in the joint lease, but was being relied upon by the petitioner in every way under the respondents who was the tenant. It was in possession of the landlord; the applicant subject to the terms of the tenancy was rightfully evicted by the courts. AD was ordered when the constitutional petition was dismissed under the circumstances. when you need a advocate from Dargai lawyer