Find a Lawyer

DR. IRSHAD ALI SOOMRO versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH

CL 23 2 3 The Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 4 Removal from the Service The Appellant Service Tribunal was granted 180 days leave as extraordinary leave without pay, but It was stated that after receiving the leave, the appellant could not resume his work. Duty appellant, after showcasing notice, restored the appellant from employment, but terminated the interim period as extraordinary leave, according to Sindh Badge Corporation Service Rules / Regulations Governor, CL233. had gone. The appellant, without pay, claimed that he had again requested an extension for a three-month leave, but he could not prove his claim from the evidence on record that the illegal dismissal of the job was illegal and invalid. Was gone and was restored from employment, he could not be paid his wages during which he was exempted from employment. Appellant had to resume work for 180 days after his termination, but his duties. They failed the appellant, who had only gone abroad for 180 days, despite the fact that he was allowed by Pakistan. Appellant's departure without leave was synonymous with mismanagement, he could not prove that in the meantime he did not work anywhere to receive financial benefits, for which period he was not entitled to salary which he was entitled to from employment. Stay away from r \ n \ r \ n famous high court advocate from Makli lawyer