ROSHAN KHAN versus KARACHI CANTONMENT BOARD THROUGH EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND 3 OTHERS
Section 54 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O xxxxx, Rr 1 and 2 Applicants for Public Way Ease, Right to Suit and Permanent Order of Prohibition, were charged by the defendant with an iron gate on the road and closed two lanes. The plaintiffs' claim that the defendants had no right to tell the two routes under the law of the adjoining case, except that other residents of the land and property concerned had the right to do so. In order to use the manner in which the defendants applied for provision of interim relief until the final decision of the trial that the disputed area plaintiff and other area residents had long been using as an outlet, the Gazette Was recorded in the form of a notification. This fact was also proved on the record by other evidence that the balance of convenience was on the part of the plaintiffs and the defendants' dispute was that the petition was filed because the defendant could not be allowed for interim injunction. The claim was the same, it was postponed, the claimant requested interim relief, the rights of the parties were to be decided after the recording of the evidence The public road and no road block / prohibited application was allowed to the extent That the respondents were barred from crossing / interrupting the question and if there was any restriction by the respondent Or if it was installed, it will be removed, and the matter will be retained until that position is retained.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
