Find a Lawyer

BABAR HUSSAIN versus STATE

The testimony of section 2 302 (b) of the testimony was the evidence of the circumstances of the case against the accused, while the statement of the deceased's father, who stated that the accused and the deceased were together with his family, was filed by FI. Such statement was recorded thirteen days after the registration of R prosecution witnesses. The person who said that they had last seen the dead and the accused together, could not be said as proof of their last viewing because there was no time and space available for one of their witnesses. The complainant was a friend of the party's extra-judicial confession What the accused did not believe before the prosecution's witnesses, as the witnesses did not paint or inform the police `otherwise Confession is always considered a very weak form of evidence, especially when there is no evidence against the accused. Extra judicial confession was rejected, in which case the bones allegedly recovered were not even sealed in the parcel. Such a fact would support the conclusion that the bones were not of the dead, even of the father. And the brothers' brothers did not identify any of the bones, saying. That the persons concerned were not brought on record to kill the victim for any purpose, either during investigation or at trial, failing to prove their case against the prosecution suspects. And was convicted by a trial court. Put it aside to give him the benefit of the doubt and the accused was acquitted criminal advocate from Hunza Nagar lawyer