Find a Lawyer

SAGHAR KHAN versus SHELL PAKISTAN LTD.

Section (49 ()) (e) National Industrial Relations Commission (Regulations and Duties) Regulations, 1973, Registration 32 (2) Practicing unfair labor by the owners through the intervention of the party applicants Had applied to be a party to. Section 49 (4) (e) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002 was filed by the Employees Union, stating that the interlocutor did not join as one of the applicants, a central arbiter of undisputed interference. I could join any applicant because they are entitled to it. In order to give relief to the employers born in or arising out of the same act, but at the time of filing an application as a party, the only question was whether the intervention was necessary or appropriate. And in the absence of it, it was said that the request cannot be effectively and properly decided. It has been stated that no such question is likely to arise in the absence of the applicant as the question involved stated that in the absence of the applicant intervener the decision can be made efficiently and completely. For any reason, no separate application was lodged \ r \ nfor any reason famous lower court advocate from Rohri lawyer