AMIR BAKHSH versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, MULTAN
Seeking the prosecution's testimony for re-examination of Articles 540 and 439 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), section 302/324, the counsel for the parties may not have the litigation and did not re-call the prosecution's witnesses. Jaska. Referring to the witnesses was not merely a technical capability by the trial court on the basis that the defense lawyer had failed to present them with material and necessary questions, but the accused had already completed the investigation of the prosecution's witnesses. And a fair opportunity was provided, and if he were to fail to present some of the essential questions, he could only be held responsible for his disqualification, and neither the witnesses nor the prosecutor would have been negligent or negligent of the prosecuting attorney. Can cause discomfort and neither defense nor prosecution can be allowed By reopening the witnesses under Section 404040, the CCPC approved the trial case, was illegal, unlawful, and rational, had jurisdiction and, consequently, set it aside. According to which the review request was approved
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Sohawa District Daska lawyer