M.L. TRADERS THROUGH PROPRIETOR versus JUDGE BANKING COURT NO.IV, LAHORE
Section 9 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Article 151 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution of Constitutional Application Suit Two suits were pending before the Banking Court, one was filed by a bankruptcy court and the other in both suit. The filing was filed by the respondents. The lenders granted unconditional leave to the defense, which led to the application to consolidate the two cases that their subject matter is the same, similar evidence is needed for their decision and if separately. There is also the possibility of a clash of decisions if an attempt is made, but the banking court upheld the request. Through a stable trial, the cases between the parties were not only in the interest of justice but also in the interest of the parties and it was necessary to avoid them. The possibility of clashing with the Banking Court decisions was declared invalid and non-existent. From the eyes, the High Court directed the Banking Court to hold both cases after consolidation and circumstance. According to the law, the petition was allowed in the case of stable issues.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Jatoi lawyer