Find a Lawyer

KARACHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, NOW CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI THROUGH D.C.O. versus PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY RELIGIOUS AND MINORITY AFFAIRS, ISLAMABAD AND 4 OTHERS

Article 37 Martial Law Regulation (57 of 1983), Para, 6A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Dialogue for sale of property to the Karachi Development Authority for the ownership of the Iwakee Trust Property Board Was. The scheme, after inserting paragraph 6A in the Martial Law Regulation, 57 of 1983, on the payment of compensation, all contracts were terminated, unless the Tribunal established thereafter, the Tribunal thereafter Evaki Trust did not confirm the proposed sale of the property in the property. The Karachi Development Authority High Court upheld the order issued by the Tribunal Plea taken by the Karachi Development Authority in the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction that the Martial Law Regulation 1983, which was not a valid law and also a constitutional sale of public property. Opposed to a prohibited auction, may not be prohibited under the law but, as a result, the negotiation of a public property or a limited agreement as a result of inserting paragraph 6A in the Martial Law Regulation No. 57 57 in 57 Provincial government's name for the Karachi Development Authority's Residential Scheme The property transfer proposal by the Rust Property Board, without proper publicity, cannot be considered a CTA. Before attaining maturity, the Martial Law Regulation No. 57 of 1983 was repealed, it was granted constitutional protection under Article 270A of the Constitution and would be considered a valid law for all intents and purposes and the law and There was no hindrance to the sale proposal. Petitioner Authority in 1983 under Martial Law Regulation No. Para 6 advocate for immigration from Gambet lawyer