Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD QADEER versus STATE

The testimony of the prosecution witnesses, who was the 11-year-old girl, the nephew of the accused, gave the account of the testimony of the prosecution. Some questions were also put to the witness in order to find out. And dismissing the prosecution as a witness and saying that the witness answered correctly the questions in which the girl testified and gave intelligent answers to the cross-examination through defense, she at least thought Given that it was a childhood testimony that he accused of defending, the testimony was intrinsically true and credible. It was said that the witness could not be considered to have been wrongly trapped in the murder of his mother and brother. The accused, along with the accused, was seen by the accused coming out of the victim's house in a state of turmoil. The witnesses were free and residents of the same place where the incidents took place. They had nothing to do with the complaining party or the pistol against the accused, articles related to the accused and articles related to the two persons at the scene of the incident, to the firefighter's report regarding the suspect's identification. Was completely proved. Aggressive weapon was positive A number of evidence was corroborated at the time of the incident, the trial court correctly guessed that the accused was responsible for the commission of the crime, both the victim was last seen alive in the company of the accused. And the defendant knew the place where he knew the pistol was placed after the incident and the recovery of articles related to the victim, which the prosecution's witnesses in the prosecution immigration advocates contact from Taunsa sharif lawyer