Find a Lawyer

ALLAH WASAYA versus STATE

Sections 302 (b) and 103 of the testimony testimony were filed immediately after the eyewitness, the complainant and the injured witness, both belong to the deceased, who were natural witnesses in whose presence any suspicion In addition, eye witnesses made consistent statements and confirmed each other, however, they could not be expected of the villagers to accurately measure the target's attackers, especially when they posed a serious threat. Many people were armed with weapons such as Kalashnikov. The evidence of the police cannot be relied on as not being able to respond to the police was not helpful to the accused; the non-availability of the crime weapon could not proceed to the defense, as the prosecution's case was based on it. ? The evidence of the injured prosecution did not require verification by the evidence of the recovery of the accused. The accused did the cleaning. He did not request self-defense in his statement under Section 2, 2, CRPC. Attempts to confirm the assaults of unarmed people after armed with deadly and sophisticated weapons, can neither claim legitimate advantage. The allegations against Section 103, PPC, were upheld, however, that there was no previous hostility between the parties and the complaining party had a dispute over their own fields. The cause of the incident began. In view of the circumstances mentioned immediately, the death sentence of the accused has been changed to life imprisonment. online advocate from Fort Abbas lawyer