Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SARWAR versus STATE

Section 302 (b) Anti-Terrorism Act (XVII of 1997), Section 7 (a) West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 The definition of evidence was predicted and the events that took place in this case. An FIR was registered in which the accused filed a case. Specifically designated as the sole assailant who committed the murder of the deceased, who excluded the possibility of alternative or false identification of the accused, who was arrested on the spot on the weapon of the crime, The evidence of the deceased's car driver and the charge of the police escort cannot also be set aside because it is said that witnesses are natural witnesses, who cannot be suspected to be present at the relevant time. There were witnesses who had no reason to be falsely involved in the crime. Even remotely suggesting that the witnesses had any previous rivalry with the accused or that he had incited her to engage in wrongdoing. The ocular account presented by the witnesses was in accordance with the date, time and place of the accused and the presence of the accused on the occasion, and the involvement of the victim in the killing presented by the eyewitnesses was evidence of the testimony of the witnesses. Earlier, six criminal cases of the same nature were brought against the accused, which resulted in the murder of the victim, according to the crimes committed by the accused in the past, which suggested that medical evidence was a witness. Was according to As the date, the time of the incident, the weapon used in the incident and the location of the injury caused injuries to the suspect, witnesses said online advocate from Chak Jhumra lawyer