Find a Lawyer

MUSHTAQ AHMAD versus STATE

Sections 540 and 561A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 397, 324, 337A (i), (ii) and 337F (i) summon police officers as judicial witnesses in a review trial court. After the cancellation of the sanctioned order, the accused / accused has been charged, proceedings have been made to record the evidence of the prosecution, after the conclusion of the evidence of the prosecution, the applicant filed section 40,, CRPC. Under four police officers filed a petition seeking court testimony, claiming that police officers have declared him innocent. / The accused was given permission to petitioner to present to police officers as a defense witness, one of the police officers presented as a defense witness through the petitioner that he was clearly deposed. Had said that he had never investigated the case against the applicant. That he was found innocent during the investigation of the police officers, but it was not based on the factual applicant could not prove that he was declared innocent in the investigation, another police officer was tried. Although he had already died and the applicant could not present the third person, he was given many opportunities despite the fact that the policeman failed to present the Petitioner's defense testimony, the trial court had his right to defend. Was closed and the appellate court upheld the petition filed by the petitioner against the trial court's order. Was, Appellate Court Order Section 6161 A AC, CR Scopes was tried to dismiss the applicant at his request under the Defense. In fact famous high court advocate from Rawala Kot lawyer