Find a Lawyer

ANWER SYED BADSHAH versus YOUNUS TEXTILE THROUGH FACTORY MANAGER

Regulation No. 32 (2) (c) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XCI of 2002), section 49 (4) (e) Provisional relief application for the practice of unfair labor by employees, request against approval of interim relief, its In addition, to show that there was an industrial dispute pending, employees also had to disclose, at least at first, the allegations made in the application filed under section 49 (4) (e) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 2002. , With them some other material, if any, kept on record, disclosed by the Commission's unfair practice for employers, as filed by the National Industrial Relations Commission Ideas or options depending on the facilities / discomfort and irreparable damage would be in the case of applicants for interim approval. In the case of the applicants, the applicants / applicants' members did not appear to be in favor of the National Industrial Relations Commission, they were not disclosed in the interim question. ef Regarding the provisions of Regln 32 (2) of the National Industrial Relations Commission (Regulations and Duties) Regulations 1973, which attracted some degree of concern that unfair labor was likely to be prevented Due to some interim action sought for the member, prior to the passing of the improper order, the relevant reservations and legal / legal requirements were not kept which was binding on the grant of interim relief and the applicant was not the first case and Nor was the concept of facility balance / disadvantage and irreparable harm to them in favor of the National Industrial Relations Commission (Regulations and Duties) Regulations 1973 Regln 32 (2) (c) jobs for advocates from Gilgit lawyer