Find a Lawyer

ATTA RABBANI versus SECRETARY EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE AND 3 OTHERS

Section 12 (i) Proof of Compulsory Retirement Benefit Public servants were forced to retire from employment in the public interest on the charge of embezzlement of public funds. The opinion of the competent authority of the inquiry committee is that the public servant has discharged his utility and further retention of his job was not based on public interest, retirement under section 12 (i) of the Punjab Civil Servants Act, 1974 Was not and is not generally interfered with under this section but the use of such power without meeting the requirements of the public interest was not appropriate to deprive an individual of his or her legitimate rights services, Failure to satisfy court Collection 12 (the record was approved by the competent authority under i) or order service in the public interest was declared by the Tribunal and the Supreme Court directed authorities to restore employment to government employees. Was allowed top advocate from Kotla lawyer