TEHSIL NAZIM, TEHSIL MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, OKARA versus ABBAS ALI
Sections 15 (2) and 17 (1) (a) of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Order) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section 2 (BB) of the Punjab Local Government Ordinance (XIII of 2001), 5 54 Constitution of Pakistan. (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Claims for Retirement Benefits, Gratuity and Overtime, etc., Payment of Payment of Wages, Payment of Benefits and Overtime, etc., filed under Section 15 (2) of 1936. Respondent's applications filed for were accepted by the authority. The applicant / tehsil Nazim had filed a constitutional petition, under the Salary Act of 1936 and dismissing the appeal by the Labor Court against the authority order, the petitioner had requested that the defendant be employed by the municipal administration. ? Because he was not a laborer, his claim before the authority under the Salary Act, 1936, was not enforceable, the petitioner alleged that the orders of the authority and the labor court were, without authorization, void and the remedy for appeal. Even without taking advantage of them, they can be punished in a constitutional petition. Or any other alternative physician raised the question of jurisdiction under the Payment Wages Act, 1936, on the ground that the Tehsil Municipal Administration is not a factory and manufacturing process, as the Payment Wages Act, 1936, contains Have to compare duties. As defined under section 454 of Punjab Local Government Ordinance 2001, section 2 (BB) of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968, shall be made clear that the Tehsil Municipal Administration Duties, of this nature
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Kot Radha Kishan lawyer