Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus STATE

Sections 302, 452, 337F (i) and 34 of the testimonial evidence, together with the co-accused, committed the murder of the deceased by a firearm shot, while the co-accused beat the witnesses as they alleged in the FIR. It was reported that the accused / appellant was married to the deceased sister but he did not send his sister with the accused and as a result he was dying. The adjudicatory trial court was charged with murder, while the convicted and acquitted defendant was sentenced to death by co-accused, claiming that it was an unexpected event by some other person and that he was against it. The complainant was involved in this case due to previous scandal. There was no stopping at the time of the incident, the location of the incident and the presence of the injured witnesses, the determination to expunge the lies against the accused and the reasons for it, which were a rare occurrence, filed an FIR. Immediately after being taken away, there was little scope for counterfeiting. Recently, the incident took place overnight in the law of the accused, who could easily identify the accused. Even without the light, especially when the attacker stayed at the home of the deceased for a long time, and six people, including those killed during the incident, suffered injuries, the FIR was also told that there was lightning in the compound of the house. The bulb was running and that too. Medical evidence in the site's plan supported the prosecution's case, the motive was supported by the defendant's statement, although the weapon was recovered from the suspect's living room, but it was not safe to use such recovery against him. There is no vacancy and no crime family advocate from Naseerabad lawyer