Find a Lawyer

FATIMA BIBI versus DEPUTY DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER AND OTHERS

Removal of Section 5 Applying the Principle of Auditorium Partem to Providing Regular Investigation Applying the Investigation of Facts and Compliance to the Inquiry of such Inquiry and Without Involving a Government Employee Inquiry Removed from employment, the order approved by the authorities was retained. The verification of the service tribunal could not be grounded in a fact-finding investigation report for his dismissal, without engaging in such an inquiry with the public servant, such action was contrary to the principles of natural justice, referred to in section 5 ( Under 1) maximum Audi was integrated into the Ultram Podium. ) To appoint an inquiry officer or inquiry committee for investigation into the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, also to retain powers under section 5 (5) of the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance 2000. Is gone Inquiries, if it was against the accused or against documentary evidence The reasons for recording in writing If the allegations are proved on the record, there is a possibility of a substantial fine for dismissal from the employment of a public servant, therefore, the competent authority to inquire. Which was necessary to investigate the charge department. In such cases, on the basis of the fact of the inquiry report, the government employee was called for regular inquiry rather than removed from the job and the civil servants did not listen and condemned the decision by the service tribunal and the officials. The removal order was rejected. Regular release under Section 5 (1) of the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000 jobs for advocates from Sahiwal lawyer