Find a Lawyer

RAJA MUHAMMAD ZARAT KHAN versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF CABINET DIVISION

Section 18 (e) and 24 (a) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Article 54 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 9 warrants arrest of the accused, arrest of the Chairman, NAB and the investigating officer's case diary The plea offered by the duty suspect was that his arrest was illegal because arrest warrants were issued without having any material before the chairman, NAB justified his arrest when the chairman, NAB, made the accused. When an arrest warrant was issued, it did not show a case diary showing the contents were kept. The Chairman, for his reasoning and inspection before the NAB, enables him to establish an opinion in the scope of section 44, CCP. At the relevant time, the Chairman, in the absence of such evidence, has the accused warrant There was no solid evidence to issue an arrest warrant. , A legal warrant issued under Article 44, CRPC nor the Chairman's provisions could not be declared, NAB was granted the right to do so in the absence of such material as the Constitution granted. Under Article 9, citizens are guaranteed that they will be dealt with in accordance with the law. Such bail was violated The Investigation Officer did not wait to obtain the documentary evidence and to examine these documents to establish an opinion within the meaning of Section 54, CR PC. At the time of the arrest of the accused, the investigating officer did not have any material that justified the arrest. The arrest of the accused was declared illegal and in violation of Article 9 of the Constitution. inheritance advocates near Ahmadpur East lawyer