ABDUL HABIB RAJWANI versus MESSRS BROTHERS INDUSTRIES LTD.
An order was sought against the agent in his application under Sections 201 and 202 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), A XXXXX, RR 1 and 2 agency, A XXXX, RR 1 & 2, CPC. I had to stop honoring the principals. To any party, any right, benefit or interest, relating to a sole distribution agreement that conflicts with the rights, interests and interests of the Agent and to the Principals and all persons thereto or under such rights and agents Directs the agency not to interfere with its interests. No agency, together with interest, shall attract the extraordinary status of Atal as provided under 202 under the Contract Act, 1872, and in view of the 5% of the Act The authority to terminate the agency that was provided to terminate the agency would be unreasonable, forcing the agency to cancel and forcing them to continue with the relationship forever. There were huge costs. And much more because the deal itself provided for its end
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Mian Walli lawyer
