BATA PAKISTAN LIMITED THROUGH COMPANY SECRETARY AND GENERAL ATTORNEY versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR
Section 13 Landlord's Limitation on the Needs of a Tenant Ownership was jointly owned by more than one owner, with one of the owners tiling the eviction request in favor of personal necessity. The controller was served by an order to evict. The controller was retained by the appellate court; the pledge taken by the tenant was that he had made no mistake in paying the rent; therefore, the principle is that one of the co-owners owns the tenant. Could be sought for eviction, which was true that ejaculation could be traced for personal use. One of the co-owners, especially the other co-owner whose confession was made to the tenant, had no objection and was fully supporting the co-owner HC in the appellate jurisdiction exercise, Refused to interfere with the withdrawal order approved by the two courts. The second appeal was dismissed in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Jhatta Bhutta lawyer
