Find a Lawyer

MIRZA MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus STATE

Article 185 (3) Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 151 Jurisdiction to Abolish Comments by High Court Jurisdiction Principle of Audi Ultram Part Application Qualification Practically litigation against the applicant was done. Of the constitutional jurisdiction, the FIR was abolished and some negative remarks were filed against the defendants; on the petition filed by the respondents, the High Court did not take any notice from the respondents before recording the negative remarks and Neither the facts nor the circumstances justified their finding on the record of the case was not available to show that the respondent had received notice of the constitutional petition hearing, it appears that the respondent had applied for the petitioner. Worked in good faith in filing a criminal case against, High Court completes removal of remarks I got the option. The High Court was clearly correct that there can be no exception which the leave to appeal was denied. solicitors from Panjgur lawyer