MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, LAHORE AND 2 OTHERS
Removal of sections 46 and 47 West (Industrial) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Sections 1 (4) and 2 (i) and Section O15 15 Service Appellant, which is illegal As it was comforting. On clearing the plot, he was charged under the Punjab Civil Servants (Discipline and Discipline) Rules, 1999, and after being proved guilty in the investigation, the appellant filed a complaint stating that Was a "laborer", the West Pakistan, Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance, 1968 applied to them and this action could not be taken under the rules of competence and discipline of the Punjab Government employees. , 1999 The Labor Court dismisses the appellant's complaint request without having to qualify. The Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance, 1968, was applied to the appellant, but proceedings against the appellant under the FCCE began with the disciplinary rules, 1999; no prejudice in the case of appellant. Was conducted under the qualification and discipline rules of both the state government employees, 1999 as well as the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968, conducting the inquiry and then providing the charge sheet. The retaliatory action against the employees, if the chargesheet allegations were justified, was a labor court forum for processing the complaint under both laws, and the procedure was not the same in both provisions of the law. I, if the appellants were declared to be in the wrong supply of the law, it was not because they were
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
