Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY, AGRICULTURAL DEPARTMENT, LAHORE AND ANOTHER versus SHAHID PERVIZ AND OTHERS

Rr 3 (b) and 4 (1) (b) (v) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) forfeiture of GP Fund Advances on dismissal of employment, reduction of period three steps and recovery of embezzled money. The return of cash vouchers through cashier's association with returning government employees, in charge of the service tribunal on appeal, restored the government employees, but retained the fine of collection of money and reduced the time scale by a phase-in penalty. Maintained that the penalty imposed on civil servants was not appropriate as the cashier accepted the responsibility to forfeit such money through his oath. Had done. Confirmation of validity Government employees put on their signatures without proper certification and supervision Government employees were required to take extra vigilance in sensitive matters as responsible officers and were not required to confirm the payment without vouchers. The ability to take reasonable care and be vigilant in checking bills, so that no mischief can be inflicted by the cashier's charge against public servants as they were neither a party to such fraud nor from transactions. Financial loss caused by fraud to the beneficiary government Cashier or recovery would not be appropriate officials Supreme Court accepted as part of maintaining a fine scale could reduce the amount of recovery of penalties by the appeal partially famous high court advocate from Sanjwal lawyer