Find a Lawyer

ALLAH RAKHA versus STATE

Definitions of Sections 302 (b) and 337f (2) Proof of FIR filed immediately after the case of the alleged FIR and the circumstances of the single accused were intimately related and the real brother to his brother's original The killer cannot be expected to leave. And the false testimony of the deceased witnesses with the deceased was false, there was no standard for dismissing their testimony, if so, the eyewitness who was affected by the conviction was also his actual nephew. Who was his witness and had full depth. It was confirmed that the accused's case was also injured in the hands of the accused, on the occasion the presence of the prosecution witness is beyond any doubt that the court did not have to look at the quality nor the amount of evidence even if the prosecution. The testimony of any of the witnesses was excluded from consideration, yet the evidence of the other witnesses of the prosecution, which was affecting the trust, was also that of which there is no hostility or wrongful desire to make false accusations against the accused. Was. The offensive weapon found on the indications of the accused was found to be stained with human blood. The request for defense was not trustworthy but ridiculous, which was rejected. No mitigation case was available for the accused and the accused himself. Didn't do that. Not because of any single injury, but also on the victim and the complainant, who was the real brother of the defendant, and that the sentencing record against the accused on trial is fully maintained. Was placed and the accused was punished. Assassination cited murder list of supreme court advocates from Chak 4 b c lawyer