RANA FARHAN-UL-HASSAN versus STATE
Applicants were on physical remand for four days under sections 169 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), sections 406 and 506, but before the expiry of those four days, the Investigation Officer found the applicants innocent and executed Section 169, CR. Released under PC. The Bonds Area Magistrate sent a reference to the session judge, who canceled the applicant's bail and ordered his re-arrest. The petitioners had taken the stand that the decree was not clear as to whether the applicants would face a case. In view of the uncertainty of the situation, it would be advisable to comment on the merits of the applicant of the case, if the trial court decides to ask the applicants to stand trial, the complainant will Applicant may have the freedom to apply for a bond cancellation application. If such a request was made by the complainant before the Investigating Officer, the trial court will consider its merits as well as the decision of the law without being affected in any way by the observations of the sessions judge's advisers. Will do. Orders approved by the session judge by r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Sibi lawyer