Find a Lawyer

ANOOSHA SHAIGAN versus LAHORE UNIVERSITY OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCES THROUGH CHANCELLOR

Article 199 Writing in the nature of mandamus, the scope of mandate in the nature of mandamus may be issued to a person performing duties in relation to the affairs of a province or local authority and who does not issue a person's jurisdiction. As stated in Article 199 (5) of the Constitution, its control is quite important and it is not limited to the financial control of the government over a body, but executive control as well. This does not necessarily mean that financial control over entities that are under the control of federal or provincial governments, which may be capable of jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 199 of the Constitution, have full control over the management of a body / organization. This condition is very important for the federation, etc., to declare that it is the person who performs its duties in connection with the affairs of the federation, etc. It is necessary for the federation to have full control over whatever decision it takes to carry out such matters and to terminate it. And it should have the final, complete and final authority to make important policy decisions. In addition, the state should also have financial control of the organization, empowering employees to dismiss and dismiss them, appoint appointments and remove them, to run the affairs of the organization as usual. And the Federation has the financial control of both. The organization lacks the organization; Article 199 of the Constitution does not mean that an individual can be organized to carry out the affairs of a federation or province against an organization / institution, There are no eligible principles. best advocate from Ratto Dero lawyer