Section 9 (c) contradiction in the evidence appreciated evidence The accused was arrested while traveling on public transport and was carrying 5 kilograms of hashish, the accused was sentenced by the trial court and sentenced to 14 years imprisonment and fine. Statements marked discrepancies. Prosecution witnesses about the names of those who boarded the bus when it was stopped. Regarding the number of adjacent seats; and on the departure of the bus when Pulia had raised questions from the accused that in view of such contradictions, his conviction is not justified in all contradictions. This was minor because such contradictions did not alter the basic story of the prosecution, nor did such contradictions reform. Such contradictions made to strengthen the prosecution's case were not appreciated for major contradictions and could be safely ignored when the evidence was recorded after a period of one year when the prosecutor filed his case against the accused. Proved it. Reasonable doubt but the sentence is high, therefore, it was reduced to 10 years, accordingly the appeal was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
