Find a Lawyer

BR. JEHANZAIB RAHIML versus DR. SHAUKAT PERVEZ, DR. HAMIDA RAHIM

Article 188 Supreme Court Rules, 1980, AXXVI Supreme Court judgment review delay was filed with delay of 51 days The petitioner submitted that the Supreme Court in its discretionary jurisdiction delayed this There is ample option to forgive. Every day's delay should be justified in deciding the issue of merits, and the grounds on which the concession was sought must be admissible for a reasonable basis and delay in the law because of his own negligence. Is. The election did not file a timely review request, and after the Supreme Court bench's self-imposed statute of limitations expired, the Supreme Court's decision to approve the jurisdiction of the review was requested, review The scope is limited and unless the ground was shown to be too strong to interfere, this review was not to be entertained and even a day's delay could not be forgiven without sufficient. ause The Supreme Court could not find a valid basis or appropriate reason for condolences over the delay of 51 days in filing a review petition against the consent decree. advocate for immigration from Mari Indus lawyer