MUZAFFAR AYAZ ABID BALOCH versus REGIONAL NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU (SINDH) THROUGH DIRECTOR-GENERAL
Sections 9 (a) (iv) and 9 (b) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Appeal Bail, Corruption and Corruption Approval Prima facie case accused was a clerk in a bank and four salaries for posting it. Orders were received. In the accounts of the two departments, but instead of doing so, they posted the private orders in the private accounts, from which the two pay orders were withdrawn, the accused sent the filled credit / deposit slips handwriting expert, The report, which has a positive effect on the report, has some relevance for depositing orders for all four salaries into a private account. The accused was a bank employee who knew that pay orders would be deposited in the account of the person to whom he was issued, but despite his knowledge, he made credit / deposit payments. Fill in the private account to register one of the clearance registers was also maintained by the accused in connection with the registration, according to a positive report from the handwriting expert. y The cash charge also stated that the defendants received two sums of money which were withdrawn from the private account and was available to reasonably believe that the accused was involved in the case and also with the other accomplices. Was denied in circumstances r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
