Find a Lawyer

MAJOR (R) IJAZ AZIZI versus MUHAMMAD SHAHZAD HANIF

Section 17 (8) Temporary Rental Order, Non-Compliance of the Enclosure Tenant who temporarily fails to comply with the Rent Order, claims that the monthly rent rate of Rs 8,000 is evident from the admission lease agreement so Rs 35,000 per month. The order for collection was defamatory and arbitrary, and no withdrawal order could be issued for non-compliance, although the agreed rent was Rs. 8,000 per month as agreed by both parties but thereafter the lease dead. And the bank records proved that the premises were rentals. Prima has been increased to Rs 40,000 per month, it is stated that under section 17 (8) of the Cantonment Rent Relations Act, 1963, the decision for temporary rent was paid by the tenant by check, Rs 40,000. It was not arbitrary or the crooked tenant was legally bound. Complying with this order and in the event of non-compliance the rent controller had no option but to order the eviction of the tenants. Appeal dismissed on order question jobs for advocates from Trinda Mohd Pannah lawyer