Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YAQOOB versus STATE

The accused was not named in the FIR for defining section 302/34 evidence, but the complainant named them in his supplementary statement for which there was no provision in the Criminal Procedure Code prosecution witness which led to the account. He was not a resident of the same village, but was a resident of another Chak Syed witness who contradicted his statement in the examination, was a witness of the occasion, the statement of the witness was not substantiated by any evidence. In the absence of proven evidence, he had to be excluded from witnesses considering the evidence before which the accused filed a case. . The alleged extra-judicial confession did not constitute a crime, nor did the accused arrest the accused in the murder of the accused, nor were they presented to the police, despite the fact that they were not influential people in the area. And it is unclear why the accused chose to make them extra judicial. The prosecution's procedure for obtaining a pardon from the confessional offender or the complainant n The testimony of a highly unnatural, extra-judicial confession cannot be believed, even otherwise, the extra-judicial confession is evidence of a weak type. Without the free trial, it could not be made the basis of the conviction, while there was no independent confrontation evidence on record that the suspect was suspected to have been present at the relevant time in support of the extra-judicial confession. Wounds on a person who were easy in nature, causing the death of nature in the usual way Were not enough for them. The complainant revealed that the accused had taken the victim to the scene when you need a advocate from Sibi lawyer