Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAUKAT versus HAJI GHULAM MUHAMMAD

Schedule I, Article 1, Schedule II, Article 17 (vi) of the Civil Procedure Code (V 1908), Section 115 was decided in respect of the award of partition suit appeals arbitrators and payment of court fees on the notice of appeal against the plaintiff's property. His brother's court fee and jurisdiction is being set at Rs 24,000 for the distribution case filed and no court fee was paid after the plaintiff was excused from paying the court fee. An agreement was reached between the parties to appoint arbitrators to decide the case. The award given by the mediators through the intervention of the court was made the rule of the court and it was made part of the court's order. The challenge was stated by the appellate court dismissing the appeal filed without the appropriate court fee, which was the decision of the respondent which was accepted on the award, the fixed value of the share of the plaintiff's property. It was Rs. It should be counted that the lawyer told the court that only Rs 10 should be applied in the court of law in the partition suit and that the appropriate court fee should also be applied to the appeal memorandum. Because the appeal was a continuation of the litigation proceedings, when the division case was filed, the costs could not be paid for purposes of court fees for more than Rs.10, as per Schedule II of Article 17 (vi) court fees. Was fixed Act, 1870, as at this stage, the property was in possession criminal advocate from FR Bannu lawyer