Find a Lawyer

AMEERA KHANUM versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB HOME DEPARTMENT, LAHORE

Section 11 EE (3) and the Fourth Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The theoretical detention order was approved by the Secretary of Interior, Government of Punjab, the security / bonds filed against them were not found to be criminal in any case. ? The powers of detention in the Act, 1997 were to be subject to the exercise of their powers under the Natural Secretary, Home Department, Government or Section 11 EEE of the Anti-Terrorism Act, Punjab, 1997, wherein the applicant The real brother was arrested and detained. The 90 day petitioner claimed that the order was approved by the Authority on the basis of conscious use of mind and irrelevant material. The list of cases, which are associated with reports from the years 1990 to 1998, and in each of those criminal cases, was previously acquitted by a court of competent jurisdiction. Earlier, Dante obtained a bond under Section 11 EEE of the Anti Terrorism Act 1997 and there was no evidence that Detino had breached such bond. There was no material to prove that Datano was ever involved in sectarian activities even after the submission of bonds under Section 11EE of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, and that the Sections of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 Under section 11 (3) of the EE, the appeal was made. The order passed by the authority was served, but the same hearing and decision was made by the same person who issued a detention order that was against the principles of the Natural Justice Authority, saying that the name of the deteno was the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997. There was a lot more available in the fourth schedule. And that bond online advocate from Hariwala lawyer