Find a Lawyer

DUTY FREE SHOPS LABOUR UNION versus DUTY FREE SHOPS

Sections 22A (8) (G) and 22D against the order approved by unfair labor practice by the National Industrial Relations Commission (Regulations and Duties) Regulations, 1973, Reg. 32 (2) (c) A relief appeal was filed. Member of the National Industrial Relations Commission, whereby he dismissed the application while dealing with the application under Regln 32 (2) (c) of the National Industrial Relations Commission (Regulations and Duties), a member of the National Industrial Relations Commission, 1973; As well as dismissed this request. Temporarily apply for relief without having to put the parties to trial or presenting evidence to enable the party to prove its own material evidence, because the controversial ruling of the Member Single Bench was based on assumptions and limitations and the law of the matter and Was not based on any legal and judicial interpretation of the facts. , While accepting the appeal, could not be retained, said that the order had been set and remand was obtained to decide the petition of the mails after it was proved. Respondents were prevented from further victimization of appellant union workers while giving both sides the opportunity to prove their own convictions. \ R \ n famous supreme court advocate from Dhirkot lawyer