ASIF HANIF, SUB-INSPECTOR, POLICE LINES, SIALKOT versus DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (ESTABLISHMENT) PUNJAB, LAHORE AND 2 OTHERS
Article 3 (3 ()) Civil Hockey Team Named Police Hockey Team Winning National Hockey Championship As Reward Inspector Police Of Police As Assistant Manager Of The Team That Was Not Developed Before He filed a representation. Inspector General of Police, who had promoted the applicant, stated that the development process did not apply. The applicant filed a constitutional petition, which was rejected by the High Court, against which the petitioner filed a petition with the Supreme Court of Lokpatisi. In principle he had applied for leave to appeal, he would not apply. For the applicant, even in the circumstances of the case, the applicant's case was not equal to that of the promoter who was the coach of the winning team while the applicant was the assistant manager of the team and in the case of the promising coach the recommendation could be at different places and It cannot be said that the discriminant applicant has failed to identify any legal impairment in the unidentified verdict. His application for interference by the Supreme Court under Article 185 (3) of the Constitution was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
