SALES TAX APPEAL NO.K-443 OF 2000, DECIDED ON 30TH SEPTEMBER, 2005. versus SALES TAX APPEAL NO.K-443 OF 2000, DECIDED ON 30TH SEPTEMBER, 2005.
Sections 7 (1), 8 (1) (B), 33, 34, 36 and 46 sales tax evasion due to incorrect adjustment of input tax. Appeal is appealed to the Tribunal Authority to make a deposit under this Section 36 under its guidance. In addition to the Sales Tax Act 1990, the applicant was also fined under Section 33 (7) of the Sales Tax Act 1990, for non-declaration of extra tax received under section 34 of the Appellant, Section 8 of the Central Board of Revenue ( L) (B) had no authority. Input tax adjustment on controversial goods was prohibited under the Sales Tax Act 1990 as it was not specified in the notification and the provisions of Section 8 of the Sales Tax Act 1990 should be strictly considered and against the appellant. The start of the proceedings was a wrong move and was not guaranteed. The law allows the appeal, the unreasonable order was set aside
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
