Find a Lawyer

GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE, BOARD OF REVENUE, BALOCHISTAN, QUETTA AND ANOTH versus ABDUL RASHID LANGOVE

Under the facts that came to the facts before the High Court's limitation, the plaintiffs filed an appeal under section 42 of the Lim42 Limitation Act (190 IX of 19088), section Civil Civil Code (v. 1908), section 115. Claimed the right to rent. It was recognized and should be listed in the tenancy column to the extent of 5/6 shares, since it was dismissed by the trial court from its ancestors suit filed by the plaintiff and such judgment. And the order was upheld by the lower appellate. The court, which was filed before the High Court's dismissal, was revised because it was barred by limitation because the plaintiff of legal reform did not challenge the Land Reform Regulations 1978 violations. The clause of section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1908, was not available at the time of filing the review before the Court. The petition under the Land Reforms Regulations, 1972, found no legal flaw in the Supreme Court's decision to dismiss the appeal. advocates from Baroute lawyer