Find a Lawyer

ATIQUE REHMAN versus HAJI KHAN AFZAL

Section (67 ()) and Candidate's 99-year Candidate's Decision on the Civil Court Order Election Petition was allowed by the Election Tribunal on the basis that the returning candidate was not 25 years old when he Your papers were prepared at the time of nomination submission. Even before the candidate submitted the nomination papers, his age was set by the civil court. On the date of filing of the nomination papers, the decision of the Civil Court, which fixed the candidate's age more than 25 years, was sustained, due to the fact that at the age of 25, on the date of the nomination of the papers, it cannot be claimed. He was ineligible to contest the election, the candidate was registered as a voter in the constituency from which he was contesting and did not suffer. No other incompetent candidate was contested to contest the election, nor was any appeal filed against the nomination papers. Or challenging the order passed on the application under section 12 (2) CPC, further stated that the Election Tribunal was not competent to sit on the decision of the civil court, in contravention of the order in relation to age. There will be no jurisdiction to pass the order. The decision of the candidate approved by the Election Tribunal was set aside App r \ n immigration advocates contact from Haripur lawyer