MUHAMMAD BASHIR versus ZUBAIDA BEGUM
Article 5, Schedule and Section 10 (4) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 After filing a written statement of the constitutional petition for dissolution of marriage, the proceedings of the trial reconcile the recording of the statement of the plaintiff to the date on which the respondent Did not have a certificate The Notts Family Court ruled in favor of the provisions of section 10 (4) of the Family Courts Act, 1964, in the event of a failure of reconciliation between the parties, it was bound to compile matters and record evidence. Such a method was neglected. In the absence of the defendant, his statement was recorded and no hearing was made before the trial and no attempt was made for reconciliation, nor were the parties married three decades ago. Was dissolved without follow-up, the family court illegally passed a decree and the plaintiff's high court hurried unnecessarily on the back of the constitutional petition, declaring the unknown order invalid and absent. , As a result, will be considered pending before the Family Court for its latest decision in accordance with law. \ R \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Badin lawyer