Find a Lawyer

MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED versus PRESIDING OFFICER, PUNJAB, LABOUR COURT NO.VI

Section 2 (XXX), 46 and 48 of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), Section 2 (i) and the maintenance of the Section O12 service of the respondent / worker from the High Court. Services were terminated for no reason, the employee filed a complaint, which resisted the employer's claim, before the complaint was banned because the notice of complaint was set by law. Was not submitted within the specified time. And second, that the employee `was not a laborer, the complaint filed by him was not a applicable labor court; after recording the evidence of the parties, after the permission of the employee's complaint was requested, the employer appealed from the High Court. Appeal was filed after the approval of the complaint notice to the complainant 22 days after the receipt of the termination order, which was so high within the time fixed by law by the law that the complaint notice was timely run and As a result, the complaint request was not banned, no one was retained, in fact under the employee Yes and he had no option to rent and fire, he could not leave or refuse nor had any authority to take any condolence action, the employee was sitting in a large hall with the scholars and He was not provided by telephone or car, his main duty was. The RTC was to be issued in his hand and he was maintaining the relevant register. The proof was not provided by the employer law firms from Taxila lawyer