Find a Lawyer

FARMAN ALI versus STATE

The value of section 2?2 (b) and 34 of the evidence was disposed of on a broad day and an FIR was lodged in connection with which the two accused were specifically named as the perpetrators of the alleged murder. And had an active participation in it. The incident was attributed to him. The incident was a paved road frequented by Chuck residents, and the same was located in the area of the Chuck Fire that was frequently used in the incident, and thus presented the incident. came. It was almost impossible to believe that there was no witness to the incident, and the perpetrators involved were unknown and the unknown prosecution presented two witnesses before the trial, one of them, the original complaint father. Was. The victim and he had absolutely no reason to falsely implicate his son in the brutal murder of his son. He made a perpetual statement before the trial court about the incident and clearly pointed his accusations at the two accused. There was no contradiction in his statement about the place where the FIR was filed. His statement about the main incident was independent witness to other witnesses and was not related to the deceased or the complainant and no credible reason was disclosed on the record of the case to ascertain whether he had killed the accused in the murder. Why was wrongly blamed? The matter; he also made a permanent statement before the trial court and the authenticity and authenticity of the statements of both witnesses not only created the trust of the trial court but was also found to be effective through the High Court's FIR, ask a advocate free from Tarbela lawyer